151 Queen Street
![]() |
Images: 151 Queen Street, The New Zealand Herald, 2014. |
The 1980s were a time of transformation in New Zealand, marked by economic liberalisation, corporate excess, and a cultural shift that redefined the country’s identity ‘from the world’s first welfare state to the world’s first post-welfare state’. The fourth Labour government instituted sweeping reforms known as Rogernomics. Spearheaded by Minister of Finance Roger Douglas, this involved deregulation, privatisation, and the removal of subsidies which reshaped the economy and heralded a new era of market-driven growth.
Amid this backdrop, urban landscapes evolved to reflect the changing times. Auckland’s Central Business District (CBD) became a playground for corporate ambition, with new skyscrapers symbolising power and modernity. This research series examines how the evolution of built heritage sheds light on social and cultural changes. It does so primarily by following the lives of three Queen Street locations: numbers 151, 131 and 205. I centre on the 1980s – the decade which exemplifies the phenomenon best – but to tell a comprehensive story of these three locations and how they reflect sociocultural change necessitates examination of decades before and after as well.
In this first article, I explore 151 Queen Street. The SAP Tower was once the Fay Richwhite Tower, a building linked to the commercial ethos of 1980s New Zealand and its corporate juggernaut namesake. The story of this tower shows the intersection of economic ambition and architectural transformation that occurred on New Zealand’s main street during that period.
Before 151 Queen Street became a capitalist symbol, its site played a quieter role in Auckland’s history. In the early twentieth century, the site housed modest retail premises and small businesses, typical of the area’s mixed-use character. One high-profile occupant was the New Zealand Herald, who maintained buildings adjacent to each other at 151 Queen Street and on Wyndham Street and Albert Street (The Herald maintained a presence on the block for 152 years to 2015).
Not dissimilar to other metropolises of the world like London and New York, as Auckland’s population and economy grew, so did the demand for more substantial and modern structures. By the 1970s, the pressure to maximise land use in the CBD meant many older buildings were being replaced with taller, more ambitious constructions. Combine this with Roger Douglas’s forthcoming privatisation programme and deregulation of the financial sector and the stage was set for a transformation of the CBD, including 151 Queen Street.
![]() |
Image: Anne Gibson. New Zealand Herald buildings on Queen St, Wyndham St and Albert St, circa late 1970s or early 1980s. The New Zealand Herald, December 11, 2015. |
Fay, Richwhite & Company was a private investment and merchant banking firm founded by Sir Michael Fay and David Richwhite. The company was emblematic of the 1980s—an era of aggressive financial manoeuvring, leveraged buyouts, and speculative investments. Operating at the forefront of Rogernomics, Fay Richwhite played a pivotal role in the privatisation of state assets and the restructuring of major industries. The firm’s activities often drew public and media attention, earning both admiration and criticism for its perceived embodiment of wealth and excess.
Sir Michael Fay and David Richwhite were central figures in the radical changes in New Zealand society in the 1980s and 1990s, a period covered by the TVNZ docuseries ‘The Revolution’. Fay, known for his sharp business acumen and flamboyant personality (Metro: ‘the one with grand ideas’), became one of the country’s wealthiest individuals. Richwhite, with a quieter but equally incisive approach (‘the professional, thorough and careful banker’), complemented Fay’s style. Together, they forged a partnership that drove major financial transactions.
Metro reported that Richwhite had accumulated $52 million in profit for 1989, “and Fay was coming home to help him spend it”. Meanwhile, in 1991, Fay, Richwhite & Co highlighted its involvement in deals and contracts worth a combined $3.7 billion. If the assumption that Fay Richwhite typically earned four per cent of the deal price in fees held true, the company walked away with $147 million in revenue that year. The 1991 NBR Rich List estimated that Fay and Richwhite were each personally worth $150 million.
While their successes were celebrated in some quarters, Fay and Richwhite also attracted scrutiny. The pair were characteristic, even symbolic of 1980s ‘yuppie’ culture. That is, ‘young urban professionals’ or ‘young upwardly-mobile professionals’ who emerged not only on Wall Street but Queen Street as well in the eighties. Buoyed by the money flowing through the deregulated economy, Auckland’s yuppies lived extravagant lives. Led by its two namesakes, Fay Richwhite disciples exemplified the yuppie style and manner. Michael Fay’s fortieth birthday party in March 1989, in which one hundred and thirty guests were ferried or flown to his own Great Mercury Island, and a Fay Richwhite Christmas party in 1991 where staff sang, ‘I’m dreaming of a Richwhite Christmas’ stand out as particularly exorbitant and personify yuppie culture.
![]() |
Image: Rob Tucker. Michael Fay and David Richwhite. Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 1423-0448. |
151 Queen Street was envisioned as a statement of corporate ambition. It became synonymous with its namesake company and the world of finance during that decade. Designed by Dino Burrantini of Peddle Thorpe & Aitken, the building reflected contemporary trends in commercial architecture – clean vertical lines, bronze reflective glass facades, and a modern aesthetic. The narrow ends of the tower are separated into three parts which terminate at different heights, creating the illusion of adjacent towers.
The Fay Richwhite Tower housed tenants distinctly differently from those previously occupying 151, reflecting not only its premium status in Auckland’s commercial property market, but also a changing CBD at large. Initially, the building served as the headquarters for Fay Richwhite and other financial firms like NZI, cementing its association with high-stakes corporate activity. Other occupants played in real estate (Century 21 and Colliers), consulting (Sedgwick), and architecture (Peddle Thorpe & Aitken, who designed the building) . 1980s glitz and glamour had also made time for a health club and coffee shop within the building. Over time, its tenant mix further diversified to include law firms, executive search firms and multinational companies. This adaptability ensured its continued relevance in Auckland’s CBD into the nineties and beyond.
At its completion, the building stood as one of Auckland’s tallest and most prestigious office towers, symbolising the economic optimism of the time. In 1992, upon the building’s completion, it was one of six winners of the New Zealand Institute of Architects-Resene National Awards of Architecture. A less prestigious title, it also earned the title ‘the big pinkie’ because of its unique rose-tinted glass.
151 Queen Street attracted significant attention during and after its construction. Publications like Metro magazine and major newspapers frequently commented on the building, often linking it to the fortunes of Fay Richwhite and the broader economic narrative of the time. Writing for Metro, Jan Corbett and Nicola Legat contrasted Fay and Richwhite’s early beginnings leasing a two-room suite in O’Connell Street, South Auckland with ‘the huge, pink Fay Richwhite Tower’ which they said announced to pedestrians along Queen Street, ‘We’ve arrived! We’re successful! We’re 29 floors of granite and glass!’
Some praised its modern design and role in revitalising Queen Street, while others criticised it as a monument to excess and a disregard for heritage preservation. The building became a physical representation of the polarising impact of Rogernomics – a beacon of progress to some, and a symbol of greed to others.
There are always people who oppose successful individuals, especially in New Zealand and especially investment bankers. But two out of three letters to the editor concerning Corbett and Legat’s Metro article were taking offence at something outside the thrust of the article. The third respondent was objecting to ‘the Switzerland of the Pacific’ target, though their last line read, ‘If, within 18 months, Fay, Richwhite are history, remember you read it here first.’ Alternatively, one commenter on an Auckland Libraries Research publication focusing on the New Zealand Herald’s presence at 151 lamented at how ‘those two confidence trickers were able to tear down that beautiful building to put up a shoddy and forgettable glass tower…’
Possibly New Zealand’s most prolific architectural historian and benefactor of the Auckland Library Heritage Trust and Auckland History Initiative, John Stacpoole held the Fay Richwhite tower in a positive light. In an interview published by Architecture New Zealand in 2004, Mr Stacpoole said, of his own volition, ‘I did quite like that bronze building of Fay Richwhite.’ Stacpoole was a great ambassador for Auckland’s heritage, particularly colonial-Victorian architecture. Thus, the tension between his comment and the phenomenon of glass skyscrapers replacing buildings of historical or heritage value must not be lost.
![]() |
Image: Leading Auckland publication Metro Magazine profiled Fay and Richwhite upon completion of their award-winning skyscraper. Metro cover, July 1992. |
151 Queen Street stands as a testament to the ambitions and contradictions of 1980s New Zealand. Its construction and history reflect the transformative forces of that era – economic liberalisation, corporate ambition, and urban redevelopment.
As Auckland continues to evolve, so too does 151 Queen Street. The Fay, Richwhite Tower is now the SAP tower. 151 is arguably emerging as a bellweather location: housing the Herald for over a century as newspapers dominated the landscape, housing Fay, Richwhite during the financial sector’s golden hour and now bears the name of a leading technology firm. Thus, the building is consistently at the forefront of economic activity CBD.
And on the outside, from below and at a distance, 151 Queen Street shines. The University of Auckland’s Errol Haarhoff said in 2006 that 151 “still stands out for its elegance among many other commercial developments that now surround it.” Almost twenty years on from that and forty years since it was an idea in Michael Fay and David Richwhite’s heads, the building and what it represents remains an important part of Auckland’s developing history.
In the next article, we explore the life of 131 Queen Street. Its transformation is different in that, although the same building has stood there for over a century, it has always evolved to meet the needs of a changing Auckland society.
#You can read the rest of Riley's articles here:
Part 2 - 131 Queen Street
Part 3 - 205-225 Queen Street
Riley is currently in his third year of a Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Commerce conjoint degree, majoring in History, Economics and Finance. His research project sits at the intersection of these three subject interests. It also pays homage to architectural historian John Stacpoole OBE, a foundation trustee of the Auckland Library Heritage Trust, which generously provides two Summer Research Scholarships annually in his name.
Riley’s research explores how built heritage has reflected change in Auckland’s CBD, particularly during the 1980s reform period. He is fascinated by the economic, social and cultural forces of that period and their impact on the CBD’s landscape. In analysing this, Riley documented the life of three iconic Queen Street locations: street numbers 131, 151 and 205. Riley’s case studies illustrated a clear shift in the Auckland CBD from a ‘retail mecca’ to the home of white-collar, professional services in and around the 1980s. His research also revealed how some at the heart of the 1980s boom period had a sweeping disregard for Auckland’s built heritage. This often resulted in the loss of key heritage buildings, inevitably replaced with the towering skyscrapers symbolic of that period.
Riley wishes to thank everyone who helped with his research. He was expertly supervised by Dr Jess Parr and Professor Linda Bryder. He was assisted by experts from the University of Auckland, Auckland Libraries, Auckland Council and the National Library of New Zealand. He is also grateful to all other sources from which he gathered material, including but not limited to Digital New Zealand, Donovan Images, Land Information New Zealand and Te Ara – The National Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Riley reserves a special thanks to David Simcock and the team at Auckland Library Heritage Trust for their support.
References:
Auckland Libraries Research. Facebook. November 24, 2023, https://www.facebook.com/AucklandLibrariesResearch/posts/752145643612785/
Byrnes, Anne, Private investors who moved in early are reaping rewards,” National Business Review, October 6, 1987.
Carlaw, John, dir. Revolution – 1, Fortress New Zealand. 1996. NZONSCREEN, accessed December 13, 2024. https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/revolution-1-fortress-new-zealand-2009/overview.
Corbett, Jan and Nicola Legat, “The Merchant Adventurers,” Metro, July 1992, 52-53.
Doyle, Philip, The New Zealand Herald Building, Queen Street, 1977, from Special Collections, Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 435-04-25.
Faury, Patrick, Auckland Cityscope (Wellington: Chaunter Publications Ltd, 1999), Map 7 Page 4.
Editorial, “Fay’s vision of NZ: the Hong Kong of the future,” National Business Review, October 5, 1987.
Haarhoff, Errol, Architecture of Central Auckland (Auckland: Balasoglou Books, 2006), 65.
Markets Review, “Bears enjoy their picnic, bulls lick wounds,” National Business Review, October 20, 1987.
NZ Herald, “Landmark bronzed beauty for sale,” The New Zealand Herald, April 5, 2014, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/property/landmark-bronzed-beauty-for-sale/L43DWAEDYION3UXTYEN62VW4HU/.
Phillips, Bruce, “Letters,” Metro, September 1992, 10-12.
Stacpoole, John, “Architect, Historian, Prolific Author, Generous Benefactor – John Stacpoole is an ornament to his profession(s) and his city,” interview by John Walsh, Architecture New Zealand (April/May 2004), 26.
The Shoeshine Column, “The Fay Way versus the gloomy view,” National Business Review, September 23, 1987.
Tucker, Robert John, (working as Rob Stanley), Michael Fay and David Richwhite, from Rob Tucker Collection, Auckland Libraries Heritage Collections 1423-0448.
Comments
Post a Comment
Kia ora! Please leave your comment below.